News
Australia's first mining industrial manslaughter conviction
Mastermyne was convicted in March 2026 and fined $7 million in May — a record WHS penalty. What changed, and what boards should read into it.
Prem Kumar Dvivedi · 12 September 2026
In March 2026, Mastermyne Crinum Operations Pty Ltd became the first company convicted of industrial manslaughter under Queensland's Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999, following a fatal roof collapse at the Crinum underground mine in September 2021. In May it was sentenced to a $7 million fine plus $299,000 in costs — substantially above Australia's previous record work health and safety penalty.
Source: Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer — Australia safety update: key developments January–June 2026
The penalties behind it
From 1 July 2026 the model maximum penalty for industrial manslaughter is $21,274,000 for a body corporate and 20 years' imprisonment for an individual. New South Wales carries the highest in the country at $20 million and 25 years. In April 2026, NSW also recorded its first gross negligence verdict under a Category 1 offence, against Young Mining Company, after a worker suffered severe crush and spinal injuries.
Source: Safe Work Australia — maximum monetary penalties under the WHS laws
What a board should take from it
Individual liability is the part that has changed in substance. Officers carry a due diligence duty that cannot be delegated, and the evidence for it is ordinary: what you were told, when, what you asked for, and what you did about it. Minutes that record a safety report being "noted" are not evidence of due diligence. Minutes that record a decision, a resource and a date are.
ISO 45001 does not prevent a prosecution and no consultancy should suggest it does. What a working system produces is the record — hazard identification kept current, incidents investigated including near misses, competence evidenced, drills actually run — which is the difference between a defensible position and an indefensible one.
What this covers
See how this looks as a working system
Reading about a requirement and seeing the documentation that satisfies it are different things. In a short demo we open the actual manual, procedures and records set for ISO 45001, show you how each clause is answered and where your existing way of working already fits. You will know what implementation involves before you commit to it.
More reading
- ISO 45001:2018: documentation and compliance requirements
Everything ISO 45001:2018 requires you to document, clause by clause, with what an auditor asks to see for each. Written as requirements rather than as a checklist.
12 September 2026
- ISO 9001:2026 is published: what the transition asks of you
The new edition of ISO 9001 publishes on 16 September 2026, with a three-year transition expected. What changes, what does not, and when to act.
12 September 2026
- New Zealand's safety reform: critical risks, from April 2027
The Health and Safety at Work Amendment Act got Royal Assent in July 2026 and starts in April 2027. It narrows the focus to what can actually kill people.
12 September 2026
