Writing Learning Outcomes That Can Be Clearly Assessed

Writing Learning Outcomes That Can Be Clearly Assessed

Learning outcomes are a key element of effective educational programme design and are closely connected with the principles of ISO 21001, which focuses on management systems for educational organizations.

Under an ISO 21001 approach, the way a programme is designed, delivered, assessed, monitored and evaluated should be connected to the intended learning outcomes and the needs of learners and other relevant beneficiaries.

A good learning outcome should clearly explain what the learner will be able to do after completing the programme.

How to Know if a Learning Outcome Is Assessable

Ask one simple question:

“What will I actually see the learner doing that proves they have achieved this outcome?”

If you cannot identify something observable or measurable, it is probably describing a topic or intention, rather than a learning outcome.

This is important when implementing ISO 21001, because educational organizations need to establish appropriate processes for evaluating whether intended learning outcomes have actually been achieved.

---

Common Problems When Writing Learning Outcomes

1. Describing What Will Be Covered

Example:

This module covers risk assessment.

This tells us what the trainer will teach, but not what the learner will be able to do.

A better approach is:

Learners will be able to conduct a risk assessment using the specified criteria.

The second version identifies an observable learner action that can be assessed.

From an ISO 21001 perspective, this also helps create a clearer connection between programme content, learning activities and assessment.

---

2. Using Words That Describe Internal States

Words such as:

* Understand

* Know

* Appreciate

* Be aware of

* Be familiar with

are difficult to assess directly.

For example, you cannot directly measure whether someone “understands” auditing.

Instead, assess what the learner can do to demonstrate that understanding.

For example:

Instead of:

Learners will understand the audit process.

Use:

Learners will be able to explain the audit process and apply the relevant audit criteria during a practical exercise.

This creates a more objective basis for assessment and supports consistent evaluation of learner achievement.

---

3. Describing the Trainer's Activity

Example:

The trainer will demonstrate the audit process.

This describes what the trainer will do, not what the learner will achieve.

A learning outcome should focus on the learner's expected achievement.

A better version would be:

Learners will be able to demonstrate the key stages of an audit during a practical exercise.

This distinction is particularly important for learner-centred educational design, which is consistent with the approach promoted by ISO 21001.

---

4. Being Too General

Example:

Learners will be able to manage projects effectively.

What does “effectively” mean?

What type of projects?

What criteria will be used?

What evidence will demonstrate achievement?

The outcome needs to be specific enough for achievement to be measured consistently.

A more precise outcome could be:

Learners will be able to develop a project plan identifying objectives, responsibilities, resources, risks and timelines according to the specified criteria.

---

A Simple Structure That Works

A strong learning outcome normally includes three elements:

1. An Observable Action

What will the learner actually do?

Examples:

* Conduct

* Analyse

* Apply

* Demonstrate

* Design

* Evaluate

2. The Subject or Object

What will the learner work on?

For example:

* A process

* A risk assessment

* An audit

* A management system

* A case study

* A project

3. A Condition or Standard

Under what conditions or according to what requirements must the learner perform the activity?

For example:

* Against specified criteria

* Using a defined methodology

* In accordance with applicable requirements

* Within a specified timeframe

* Using appropriate evidence

Example

By the end of the programme, the learner will be able to conduct a process audit against ISO 9001 Clause 8, classify findings as major or minor, and write a nonconformity statement identifying the requirement, evidence and gap.

This outcome is easy to assess because we can clearly identify what the learner needs to do.

The assessment method is also suggested by the outcome itself.

That is a key characteristic of a well-written learning outcome and supports the alignment of programme design, learning activities and assessment under an ISO 21001 approach.

---

Choose the Right Action Verb

The verb should match the level of learning expected from the learner.

Recall

Use verbs such as:

* List

* Define

* Identify

* State

These are suitable when the learner is expected to recall facts, terminology or requirements.

Understanding

Use verbs such as:

* Explain

* Describe

* Summarise

* Distinguish

These are suitable when the learner needs to demonstrate understanding of a concept or process.

Application

Use verbs such as:

* Apply

* Calculate

* Conduct

* Demonstrate

* Use

These are suitable when the learner needs to apply knowledge in a practical situation.

Analysis

Use verbs such as:

* Analyse

* Compare

* Differentiate

* Examine

* Investigate

These are suitable when learners need to examine information, relationships, evidence or problems.

Evaluation

Use verbs such as:

* Assess

* Critique

* Justify

* Recommend

* Evaluate

These are suitable when learners need to make a reasoned judgement based on defined criteria.

Creation

Use verbs such as:

* Design

* Construct

* Develop

* Produce

* Formulate

These are suitable when learners are expected to create or develop a new output.

The important point is to match the verb with what you actually teach and assess.

For example, if a programme states that learners will design a management system, but the assessment consists only of a multiple-choice test, there is a clear mismatch.

The learning outcome requires a higher level of performance than the assessment measures.

Under an ISO 21001-aligned approach, this type of alignment should be considered when designing and evaluating educational programmes.

---

Align the Assessment With the Learning Outcome

Once the learning outcome is written, the assessment should naturally follow from it.

The following approach can help:

Recall

Learning outcome: The learner can identify or state relevant information.

Suitable assessment:

* Written test

* Quiz

* Short-answer questions

* Knowledge-based assessment

Understanding

Learning outcome: The learner can explain, describe or distinguish concepts.

Suitable assessment:

* Written questions

* Oral explanation

* Short-answer assessment

* Scenario-based questions

Application

Learning outcome: The learner can apply knowledge or perform a defined task.

Suitable assessment:

* Practical task

* Demonstration

* Simulation

* Workplace-based exercise

Analysis

Learning outcome:The learner can analyse information, evidence or a situation.

Suitable assessment:

* Case study

* Analysis exercise

* Problem-solving task

* Evidence review

Evaluation

Learning outcome: The learner can assess information and make a justified judgement.

Suitable assessment:

* Case study

* Evaluation report

* Judgement-based task

* Presentation with justification

Creation

Learning outcome: The learner can develop or produce something.

Suitable assessment:

* Project

* Design assignment

* Management system documentation

* Developed process or other tangible output

---

Example of Assessment Alignment

Consider the outcome:

“The learner will be able to conduct an audit.”

The learner should actually conduct or simulate an audit.

Simply asking multiple-choice questions about auditing would not provide the same evidence of practical competence.

If the assessment does not match the learning outcome, one of two things may need to change:

The learning outcome may be too ambitious for the programme; or

The assessment may not be designed well enough to measure the intended outcome.

Sometimes the appropriate solution is to reduce the learning outcome to a level that can realistically be taught, demonstrated and assessed within the programme.

This alignment between intended learning outcomes, learning activities and assessment is important for effective educational programme management and continual improvement under ISO 21001.

---

How Many Learning Outcomes Should You Have?

Usually, **fewer and clearer outcomes are better.

For many programmes, around 5–8 well-defined learning outcomes may be sufficient, although the appropriate number depends on the programme's duration, complexity, level and intended results.

Having 30 outcomes for a two-day course may indicate that course content has simply been renamed as learning outcomes.

Remember:

Every learning outcome represents something you are committing to teach, assess and provide evidence for.

Under an ISO 21001 approach, learning outcomes should be meaningful, relevant to the intended learners and beneficiaries, and capable of being evaluated.

---

Review Learning Outcomes Regularly

Learning outcomes should not be written once and forgotten.

They should be reviewed when:

* The programme changes.

* The subject or applicable standard changes.

* Assessment results show that learners are consistently struggling with an outcome.

* Learner or beneficiary requirements change.

* New regulatory, technological or industry requirements affect the programme.

* Programme evaluation identifies a need for improvement.

If learners consistently fail to achieve a particular outcome, it may indicate a problem with:

* Programme design

* Teaching and learning methods

* Learning resources

* Assessment methods

* The level at which the outcome has been written

* The time available for learning and practice

This information should be used to improve the programme.

This supports the continual-improvement approach associated with ISO 21001, where educational organizations use relevant information and evaluation results to improve educational processes and outcomes.

---

# Common Weaknesses to Watch For

The most common problems are:

1. Using verbs that describe internal states instead of observable actions.

2. Describing what the course covers instead of what learners will be able to do.

3. Setting the learning level higher than the assessment can measure.

4. Having too many outcomes, making proper teaching and assessment difficult.

5. Writing outcomes once and never reviewing them against learner performance and programme evaluation data.

6. Not defining the required standard or conditions, making it difficult for different assessors to judge achievement consistently.

7. Not considering learner and beneficiary needs, which can make outcomes less relevant to the intended purpose of the programme.

8. Failing to connect learning outcomes with teaching, learning and assessment methods, resulting in gaps between what is intended and what is actually evaluated.

---

The Simple Rule

A good learning outcome should answer three questions:

What will the learner be able to do?

Under what conditions?

To what standard?

If you can clearly observe and assess the learner doing it, you have probably written a strong learning outcome.

For an ISO 21001 perspective, go one step further:

The learning outcome should be relevant to the learner and intended programme, clearly expressed, capable of assessment, and connected to the way the programme is designed, delivered, evaluated and improved.

The goal is not simply to write better statements.

The goal is to create a clear connection between:

Learner Needs → Learning Outcomes → Programme Design → Learning Activities → Assessment → Evidence → Evaluation → Improvement

That connection is what makes learning outcomes useful as part of an effective educational management system.